Saturday, August 30, 2014

Unrestricted female sexuality

Modern women absolutely hate the fact that the restriction of female sexuality is a core foundational element of civilization. But the fact is that if their sexuality is not restricted by fathers and husbands, by men who love them, then it will be repeatedly abused by men who don't and there is absolutely nothing they can do about it. Nor will the State upon which they are relying in lieu of their families. As the young women of Rotherham will bear witness:
Vicky, now 27 and training to be a paramedic, is one of the countless youngsters groomed by the predatory gangs of Pakistani men allowed to roam the South Yorkshire town with near impunity for so long.  She recalls being picked up at night in taxis in the town centre at the bottom of Ship Hill, where drunken crowds gather around takeaways and under-age white girls are seen as easy pickings.

“We would come for a night out and they would be sat around waiting in their cars,” says Vicky. “My friends had met them before me and said they had got beer and stuff like that. We would be taken to these big houses in Rotherham and Sheffield and they were always trying to give us drink and drugs. I was spiked a few times, they gave me ecstasy and cocaine. I knew what they wanted from me. I still remember being called a dirty gori [Pakistani slang for a white woman] which is what they always used to say to us.

“Once I was spiked with something and ended up in a right state. I was 15 and had tried to walk home but couldn’t get in the door. My dad threw cold coffee over me to try and wake me up.

“After that I ran away for two weeks. One of my friends went with a man to the pub and ended up being taken away for a few days and raped. She reported it to the police but nothing ever got done about it.” 
Notice that she ran away from the protection of the only man who didn't want anything from her. As civilization and Western culture wanes, all the protections that the modern woman relies upon in her unrestricted sexual freedom vanish.

If women genuinely prefer to be dirty goris rather than restricted wives, daughters and mothers, there are millions of waiting barbarians who are more than eager to drug and rape them. Of course, the fact that they have to be drugged and raped tends to indicate that it's not a choice they would knowingly make if they truly understood the consequences of choosing the protection of the indifferent state in preference to the protection of a man who loves them.

The State will not protect you. That is the message that has to be driven home to young women. The State does not care and it will not protect you.

44 comments:

minarchyblog said...

It's hilarious anyone believes they were "spiked" rather than happily exchanging sex for drugs. Everyone lives in a fantasy world

retrophoebia said...

I've written similarly about how underage/consent laws are merely the poor substitution of the state for the presence of engaged male family members.

selflinkwhorage: http://retrophoebia.wordpress.com/2012/06/08/18-revisited/

Laguna Beach Fogey said...

"As civilization and Western culture wanes, all the protections that the modern woman relies upon in her unrestricted sexual freedom vanish"

One of the things I've always found interesting about feminism is that its progress in undermining traditional institutions, standards, and male authority is bringing about the conditions under which women and feminists in particular will suffer. They are making their own bed, and lying in it.

Mindstorm said...

Too little, too late. These women have their habits established already when graduating from High School. Courtesy of BlackPoisonSoul: http://researchnews.osu.edu/archive/chains.htm (especially the sidebar graph).

hjablome said...

The approaching K Shift will restrain quite a lot of female sexual misbehavior. Sadly, there will also be a great deal of bloodshed and social upheaval.

We are a foolish species, we humans.

vashine said...

Fantastic post. Hard hitting. Which is exactly what women and young girls need to hear. The ones that are hopelessly lost will shriek, and thereby out themselves. Many, many more will either openly or secretly be utterly relieved to hear... that there are men who truly care, love and know HOW to take care of, protect, and love the women around them.

Women not so coddled and spoiled by material comfort and lack of exposure to real violence and warfare don't even have to think about it, they instinctively know that their sexual propriety and the desire for men to be loyal to them and protect them from the horrors of the world have a direct relationship.

US and Western women have forgotten this. But so have the men. Wake up people.

Christ the King.

Yohami said...

"She recalls being picked up"

The horror.

"under-age white girls are seen as easy pickings."

So what? if they are easy to pick up, its because they want to be picked up.

If she goes to a house party? where people are giving her drugs and she's free to walk away, she's there because that's what she wants to. Kidnapped? no, picked up. You're free, girl, now open your legs and shut up.

Retrenched said...

The big takeaway here is that feminists do not care about the well-being and safety of women and girls. They only care about “The Struggle”, the demographic-based class warfare which casts white males as the unfairly privileged bourgeoisie who need to be brought down by the state. Feminists do not care about women and girls who are raped, drugged and abused by non-white men. They're far more concerned about stopping white males from telling "sexist" jokes or saying hello to girls in elevators or whatever.

Nominee said...

People make their own hells.

Unknown said...

In Britain, loving and protective men are denied the means to exercise protection of their families, even in the face of an indifferent State, due to strict gun conttrol laws and laws favoring the rights of the perpetrators over those protecting themselves and others. NEVER yield your right to keep and bear arms, particularly in the face of a state that is indifferent AND corrupt.

Think those dirty Pakis would operate with impunity like tha,t in a midwestern or southern US city of 250,00, when the cops turned a blind eye to those crimes? More than a few would likely be found to have "committed suicide" from gunshots to the backs of their heads or from jumping off tall buildings or bridges!

b1bae96e-6447-11e3-b6bb-000f20980440 said...

@ Vashine

Its okay. The liberals have a solution. Its called verbal affirmative consent. It seems absurd now, but in a few years they will role out the fact that it will need to be witnessed, and a couple years after that the witness will need to be a licensed official who will perform a ceremony. And just so there is no mistake as to when consent ends, an official annulment will follow a few years after that.


These women have their habits established already when graduating from High School.

That chart can't be right as I have been assured that 1 in 10 people are not hetero normative, and this graph only shows one experimental homosexual encounter, and an MFF threesome. That is less than 1/2%.

In seriousness though I find that chart fascinating, if accurate. About 1 in 5 women are sluts (3 or more partners in high school), which really does mean that whatever is causing it happens at a young age because that is not appreciably more than what the college data shows.

It also looks like the number of alphas is quite small. Only 11 men managed 4 or more female partners, only one managed more than 5 (he had 9). Meanwhile, 20 women had 4 or more sexual partners.

de ti said...

I am reminded of this Dalrock blurb:

http://dalrock.wordpress.com/2012/06/06/what-husies-want/

“I think there is another side to the same coin. These women don’t just want to build a better beta, they want to tame the alpha. In fact, I think the former is just another way they are trying to approach the latter. They want to take an inherently unsafe activity and make it safe. They want to submit to a man without having to submit; they want a man who can tame their feral self. They want him to trip their danger signals. Even better if he is a stranger from a strange land.

“They want this all to happen without giving up their freedom; they want to play this out in the context of serial monogamy, so they can feel loved while also claiming their promiscuity is moral. They want to lose control to a string of strangers who have all of the hallmarks of very dangerous men, and they want a promise that this will always end well.

“They want to know that this will be safe, without it losing the excitement of it feeling unsafe. They are telling men to build a sort of serial monogamy amusement park where they can ride the roller coaster and experience the fear of falling or crashing, while knowing that just behind the scenes grown ups are actually in charge and are responsible for them safely feeling unsafe.

“One more thing. As I mentioned above they don’t want to be hemmed in. So instead of building an actual amusement park, they want roller coasters to spring up randomly in the same exact circumstances where the real danger they mimic would appear. They want to be driving their car on the freeway one instant, and the next experience the fear of careening out of control. They want to impulsively jump off the edge of the Grand Canyon and have a parachute appear and deploy at the last minute. And all they ask is your guarantee that all of this will be safe.”

cailcorishev said...

Related: a friend of a friend on Facebook posted about how she had a flat tire recently and no one (no MEN, of course) stopped to help her. She even asked a trucker for help, and he told her it looked like she had it under control (HA!). She did manage to change the tire, at least. But it's been funny to watch all the women and manginas, incensed that a woman had to muster up a little Girl Power and take care of a minor inconvenience without a White Knight coming to her rescue.

One woman tried to point out that a man who stops to help women could be accused of sexual assault, so we won't take the risk. She's wrong; that's not the reason. It's simply that women rejected the deal when they decided they didn't want to be the "weaker sex" anymore. Today's woman has her own job, her own car, her own money, her own cell phone -- why would she need a man's help with anything?

But anyway, this one woman posted several comments trying to explain to these people that you can't have both feminism and chivalry, but all the other commenters are just ignoring her and going on about how shameful it is. It's hilarious.

tilikum said...

damn Vox, great post.

jseliger said...

Notice that she ran away from the protection of the only man who didn't want anything from her. As civilization and Western culture wanes, all the protections that the modern woman relies upon in her unrestricted sexual freedom vanish.

Have you read Camille Paglia and particularly her essay "No Law in the Area," which is part of Vamps & Tramps? If not, you should.

jimmy-jimbo said...

Can't she call a tow service? What wrong with these women? Besides, a women should never solicit help from strangers. She should lock herself in the car and wait.

donalgraeme said...

Modern women absolutely hate the fact that the restriction of female sexuality is a core foundational element of civilization

Its not just modern women Vox. ALL women, throughout history, have hated that fact. It is just that until the modern era, civilized men knew better than to listen to, much less do, what women said.

Most women simply cannot understand that the traditional restraints on their sexuality (exercised primarily by fathers and then husbands) were for their own good. It ties into some of what Rollo has argued with his War Brides theory- that the female mind is structured to hide its true nature (and likely for women's own good).

Sadly, this has meant that women have pushed for the kinds of policies that rob fathers and husbands of the power to defend the women they care about. I know I'm preaching to the choir here, but they are their own worst enemies.

PVW said...

Ah yes, because underage girls have the "right to express their sexuality," the presumption is as was mentioned earlier, that they are exercising their free choice.

Thus, there is no language to even begin discussing their exploitation. One told her story: "Stalked from the age of 15, plied with drink and slipped drugs until she became estranged from her despairing parents; ferried at night by strangers twice her age to unknown male-only parties; on one occasion locked in a house, her only escape through a window...She was bullied and pestered constantly for sex, but unlike some of her friends she was never raped." With respect to another young woman: "Even now, after being taken into care because of fears she was being exploited, she doesn’t see anything particularly wrong about the older men who befriended them when they were 15."

cailcorishev said...

Most women simply cannot understand that the traditional restraints on their sexuality (exercised primarily by fathers and then husbands) were for their own good.

Yes. You can't have both feminism and chivalry (the "man fixing a woman's tire" variety), because they're opposites. That seems so obvious that it goes without saying, but they can't see it at all, and think they have a right to both. I think it's because they did kinda get both for a while, because it took time for men to adjust to the new rules. So a generation or two of women were able to run around doing whatever they wanted, and men still stepped in to fix things for them. But guys have caught on and adjusted, and now it's easy to say to yourself, "Eh, I'm sure she's got a cell phone; let her call a boyfriend."

We're so immersed in feminism that they can't even imagine life without it. The woman who complains that her grandmother wouldn't have had to change her own tire doesn't realize -- her grandmother probably wouldn't have been tooling down the highway unescorted by a man in the first place. They take so much "freedom" for granted, not realizing the trade-off that's coming with it.

Cadders said...

"So a generation or two of women were able to run around doing whatever they wanted, and men still stepped in to fix things for them. But guys have caught on and adjusted, and now it's easy to say to yourself, "Eh, I'm sure she's got a cell phone; let her call a boyfriend."

So true - we had a 19 year old guy as an intern at work recently. When the conversation got around to acts of chivalry one day, he did not mock, or deride it. He was simply confused - he had never considered that he had any sort of obligation to provide this sort of help 'just because the person was a woman', as he put it. If she wanted something done she would have to do it herself of pay some-one to do it - same as him.

The final and full cost of feminism is coming due and it will primarily be paid by today's young women - in money, misery and motherhood lost.

Jason Jonea said...

You people are deranged. Let the ladies do what they want. this is called individual rights, and freedom. you neanderthals outta go join your taliban brethren out in the dessert, if this is what you really believe. You're given the men's rights movement a bad name.

Jason Jonea said...

you people are so afraid of other men getting at your wives and girlfriends that you have developed an entire deranged worldview based on your projected fears. you really think civilization depends on your controlling behavior. Lame.

Jason Jonea said...

oh i got a blog now too, trannies. populistlibertine.wordpress.com. come fight me there, pussies.

Jason Jonea said...

What's a k shift? Is that some kind of masonic new world order speak?

Corvinus said...

You people are deranged. Let the ladies do what they want. this is called individual rights, and freedom. you neanderthals outta go join your taliban brethren out in the dessert, if this is what you really believe. You're given the men's rights movement a bad name.

Here's a clue for you, Jason: letting the "ladies" do what they want is exactly what led to this civilizational clusterf*ck that drove you into becoming an MGTOW in the first place.

PC literally wrecks civilization, folks.

Trust said...

Slightly related, slightly off topic. There was a newborn baby found in a dumpster this morning a few blocks from where I grew up. They haven't found the perpetrator yet, presumably the "mother" if you can all her that. I bet anything her excuse will be a bad bad man.

Jason Jonea said...

Feminism has gone too far, granted. But some of the points were initially good. We don't need a male version of radical feminism that's just as unjust and basically what isis is doing in the middleast. Do you want to be like isis?

This may be my last post. Vox said he put me on a 5 post limit, but we'll see.

b1bae96e-6447-11e3-b6bb-000f20980440 said...

Slightly related, slightly off topic. There was a newborn baby found in a dumpster this morning a few blocks from where I grew up. They haven't found the perpetrator yet, presumably the "mother" if you can all her that. I bet anything her excuse will be a bad bad man.

WTF? Do you live in China or the Middle East? In the US you can literally walk up to any medical profession, or first responder and hand them the baby and walk away.

Trust said...

No kidding. Little old Jacksonville, Illinois. Literally 5 blocks from the house i grew up in. Sick.

http://www.sj-r.com/article/20140830/NEWS/140839950

cailcorishev said...

Trust, that'll be an interesting story to watch. As you probably know if you're from there, Jacksonville has become more vibrant in recent years, thanks to the Cargill plant in nearby Beardstown which attracts many immigrants, first from Mexico and points south but more recently from Africa. (The Cargill website brags about the place employing people from 30 countries, in a town of 6000 people. Yeah, that makes sense.) Jacksonville is still over 80% white, which probably seems high to people who live in cities, but for its rural area, it's a big change.

That's not to say white people never throw babies away, of course, and white America has plenty to answer for over abortion. But other cultures....let's just say it'll be an interesting story to watch.

Remo said...

Oh good another "i've got a blog" troll.

mickeypavic said...

Sorry but I don't believe a word about this.

My next door neighbour and 4 of his Turk buddies were charged with gang rape (his 'victim' was the daughter of a police officer) but I saw the phone video of the 'incident' and it was absolutely voluntary.

Spare me if I don't shed a tear for these hussies.

vashine said...

@calicorishev

Nailed it. Most people are so utterly influenced by feminism and have no idea it literally has changed who they are, their very personalities, how their brains are wired, not for one second actually thinking that those thoughts, "instincts", or emotions have absolutely nothing to do with who they really are, were meant to be, were meant to think. Hence why so many 'conservatives' are politically correct, beta cowards, so ready to get all high and mighty and righteous if you dare go against core feminist beliefs. Same for so many "Christians". Their ignorance, lack of faith, and cowardice grieve Christ. God is angry, very angry. Probably not good that I'm getting through Jeremiah right now.

Neither faux conservatives nor Christians are willing to admit, or are even capable of seeing, the depths of sin, how deeply and profoundly WRONG we can be about things in life, even down to what we truly thought and felt, in our very core, was Good or True.

God's Truth is the only Truth. His Love the only Love. Bend the knee and you'll find out. The Truth will set you free.

Trust said...

In regards to the baby left in the dumpster, whoever did it will face a class 4 felony carrying a maximum prison sentence of 1 to 3 years. MAXIMUM?!?!? And the dumpster was less than a block from a police station where they could have left the baby safe with no questions asked.

Should be charged with attempted murder.

Lucas said...

So basically, the lifestyle feminists promote is the one that creates the problems they claim to fight.

Tommy Hass said...

"My next door neighbour and 4 of his Turk buddies were charged with gang rape (his 'victim' was the daughter of a police officer) but I saw the phone video of the 'incident' and it was absolutely voluntary. "

Turks =/= Pakistanis.

Conscientia Republicae said...

Turks=/= Pakistanis but equally inbred.

Paul M. Jones said...

> Notice that she ran away from the protection of the only man who didn't want anything from her.

I've been thinking about this. It seems perverse. And yet it may be just another presentation of the behavior we should expect. A woman who wants to think of herself as "strong," "independent," and above all "free" will be unable to bear any restrictive controls (as those from a protective father). Her rationalization hamster will have a much easier time dealing with being used by others ("it was a choice") than submitting to the controls of a true protector.

Me Guerrero said...

Vox I am male and would love to have an unrestricted sexuality until my 30's ,by the way would you like to give me my first kiss :$ ?

Bob said...

This is different in Rotherham. The Pakistanis usually send the slightly younger men out to charm the young girls (who are usually bred to single, drugged up mothers so out on their own at all hours looking to get into trouble and fuck).

The girls then enjoy getting charmed by the younger pakis, then find themselves getting sent allover the country in taxis to houses where they get passed around groups of the older guys and used. Sorta their own faults.

Problem is, over 100 babies have been born to this now, and it's left over 1400 broken, damaged young girls, and that's just the ones they know about. Rotherham is a small town, (NOT a city as some media outlets have been reporting it). The last few whites around here are being outbred, and unable to find decent women to forge a strong family with.

It will be even worse in a few years when these girls grow up. More single, drugged up, broken mums with daughters who get into this mess, or chavvy, violent/lethargic (take your pick), useless blokes.

Akulkis said...

So basically, the lifestyle feminists promote is the one that creates the problems they claim to fight.


Don't you know... women don't think like people.

Trust said...

As predicted, the excuses for the sick woman who put a baby in a dumpster in my hometown are rolling in. "As she raped?" "Was she abused?" "Was she scared?" "Was she too ashaned to face reality?"

My answer? Who gives a shit. If she was really raped of abused, the real definition not the feminist one, punish perpetrator. But none of that excuses putting a baby in a dumpster one freaking block from a police station and fire department where she could have left it under safe haven laws.

No one in their right mind would make an excuse for a man who left a baby for dead in the trash because he was ashamed.

We are to believe the.feminist that women are morally and intellectually superior to man, yet incapable of knowing better than to not dump a baby in the trash bc some guy.may have hurt or.shamed her?

Our society is doomed.

Mindstorm said...

b1bae96e-6447-11e3-b6bb-000f20980440, squint harder. There is another bicurious male pair in the left-downward part of the large loop.

Dr.AB Hashmi said...

Hi
Great post I like it.....
If you want more information regarding woman sex Enhancement treatment
Kindly visit: http://www.healthcareherbal.com/fezinil.php


Please Contact Dr, Hashmi
Contact No: 9999156291

Post a Comment

NO ANONYMOUS COMMENTS.